pws - Vascular Birthmarks Foundation Forum
  Vascular Birthmarks Foundation Hemangiomas  |  Port Wine Stains  |  Vascular Malformations  
VBF logo

1994 - 2014
Celebrating 20 years with
75,000 networked into treatment

Dr. Linda Rozell-Shannon, PhD President and Founder

   VBF 20th Anniversary Gala Friday, October 10, 2014 in New York City

VBF 2014 Annual Conference Saturday, October 11, 2014 in New York City

Donate to VBF    Shop VBF Products

Go Back   Vascular Birthmarks Foundation Forum > Port Wine Stain Help > Port Wine Stain Help and Resources

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-08-2006, 02:38 AM
tmart9
 
Posts: n/a
Default pws

I recently posted that my son had a PWS on his right arm and we weren't sure if he also had KT. I was so very happy to hear the doctor(2 opinions) say that he doesn't appear to have Klippel Trenaunay. We will do a follow-up in 6 months. The doctor said it is called a reticulate port wine stain. How does a reticulate port wine stain differ then a PWS? He suggested not to do laser at this point. Is it true that the earlier you do laser the better the results?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-2006, 04:16 AM
juliemn juliemn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 95
Default Re: pws

I think the term reticulate is usually used to suggest the pattern of the birthmark....sort of a birthmark blotchy pattern that seems to follow several lines. A reticulate pattern can mimic a vascular condition called CMTC. There are tests that can determine if there is truly CMTC. I believe a simple test that shows one of the possible markers for CMTC is whether it changes color with cold or warmth. But that's best left to the doctors to determine.

I've also heard mention of a vascular mark called a reticulate naevi that is closely related to a PWS...but it is suggested that it actually fades over time. Though I've only recently heard of this....not sure of the reliability of this info. I'd do a google i guess.

As for laser treatment....it's a personal decision. Generally, the younger the skin, the easier it is to see results. Limbs are notoriously stubborn. But if the PWS is not typical, there may be some reasons to not jump into it. If it covers a large portion of the arm, it would most likely require general anesthesia, and that would also be a reason to wait a bit and let him gain some weight, get older, etc. so that he'll be better prepared to have less chance of any side effect from the GA. 6-12 months is a common age. We started at 15 months...but we also didn't have a definite diagnosis until 12 months. Waiting for 6 months in your case may be a good idea....just to make sure everyone is on the same page with any treatment plan or diagnosis.

Most often there is no question that you're dealing with a PWS, but "I'm here to testify!!" ;D ;D, that not everyone's birthmark appears in the typical fashion. Our son most definitely has a PWS....but we could no see it when he was born. His actually progressed in color over time.

That there is no suggestion of KT is awesome!!!

Hope all of this rambling didn't make you nod off...

Julie

__________________
Julie H
Mom to Ben (multiple AVM's, PWS, SWS)
www.MeetBen.com
jshiggie@gmail.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2006, 04:48 AM
hankbartenbach hankbartenbach is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 538
Default Re: pws

Hi,

I agree with Juliemn about going under GA, I personnally think sooner treatment the better but it really depends on the doctor and how agressive they are. No child wants to go thru what I have. If you do early intervtion your son can live a normal life if removed if not completely it will prevent less problems in the future. I can not for say if it would be it really depends on how deep and darkness of the PWS.
Always remember if you do not like the answer you get from the doctor you can always get a third opinion. I have many for my PWS in my life as technology gets better and the V-Beam Pulse Dye Laser is safe for infants and I have used it and I recommend it.

Hope this helps.

Hank
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-13-2013, 09:48 PM
Kaitej Kaitej is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 2
Default

Hi there,

This is an old thread so not sure if anyone will respond. My daughter -6 weeks old - also has a "reticulate" port wine stain which is indeed the pattern of the PWS. I am wondering how your son is doing now since it has been a few years! Did you go for the laser in the end? Do reticulate PWS respond better to laser treatment than regular PWS? My daughter has it on her entire leg - so it will be tough to treat no matter what.

All the best,

Kate
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-14-2013, 03:09 PM
missy missy is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,724
Default

Hi Katie and welcome!

I don't think Hank reads here very much anymore... however, you might consider asking Dr. Nelson your question via http://birthmark.org/experts.php and do send him a photo as well!

Congratulations on your new baby! Hope you're having fun with her!

Missy
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump